LAWS REGARDING OTT PLATFORMS IN INDIA
Table of Contents
Introduction
OTT stages in the current age and especially during this pandemic had become the paradise for content producers, which was undeniably clear in this pandemic when a couple of creators picked to push their substance to run on these OTT’s and still got an amazing response.
A preposterous OTT media platform administration is a media administration service offered straightforwardly to watchers as consumers through the Internet. OTT sidesteps link, broadcast, and satellite TV stages, the kinds of organizations which customarily go about as controllers or distributors of such content. It has likewise been utilized to depict no-transporter cell phones, where all correspondences are charged as information, staying away from monopolistic rivalry, or applications for telephones that communicate informationas such, including both those that supplant or replace other call strategies and those that update programming software.
OTT’s are the real time features which stream sound and visual content on their foundation through the web. These administrations in the older time were just streamed content that was at that point out of theatres subsequent to acquiring, attaining and obtaining the rights from the supplier of such content. The market for OTT’s was before supposed to be a syndication of Netflix, what began getting its competition from Amazon Prime Video, the OTT wing of Amazon administrations. In India, Amazon Prime Video, Disney+ Hotstar and Netflix rule the OTT market, which have their own set of local competitors like, Alt Balaji, Voot, Sony Liv, etc. It can be said that these stages frequently fall in legal difficulty subsequently they self-manage the content that they make accessible on their platform.
As per to the newest amendment in the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961 such OTT podiums alongside with content on current affairs and digital news will altogether be scheduled and planed by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.
Indian Laws and Rules Which Handled these OTT content prior this Amendment
- Article 19(1) of the Constitution of India, provides everybody the Freedom of Speech but right under Article 19(2) of the Indian Constitution, there are reasonable restrictions in case such a content is in contrast to the wellbeing of the State, leads to hamper in the public order, international relations or aims towards inciting any crime.
- The Indian Penal Code (IPC), aids to punish anybody who has been indulged in the selling or spreading of work of literature which is obscene (Section 293). It has the intention as well as the aim of affronting religious sentiments which is intentional and done malevolently (Section 295 A). Some act where there is a publication defamatory OTT content (Section 499) and of anyone who insults any woman’s modesty (Section 354).
- The Indecent Representation of Women (Prevention) Act, 1986 aims that there is complete prohibition of indecent representation of women in advertisements, books, movies, painting etc.
- The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) makes it an offence to sell and distribute child pornography.
- Sections 67A, 67B and 67C if the Information Technology Act, 2000 be responsible for penalty as well imprisonment to be imposed on someone who has transmitted or published any type of obscene content, any sexually explicit material together with those where children are portrayed and showed in sexual activities. The Central Government of India is also delivered and provided with the authority to issue directives to block definite information to be in public access, in Section 69A of this Act.
Code of Best Practices for Online Curated Content Providers
Several of the OTT platforms signed a self-regulatory Code, the Code of Best Practices for Online carefully chosen and thoughtfully organized Content Providers which was released by the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI). This code has its roles to a framework of open disclosure. The 3 key characteristics of this code are:
- Categorization of content into separate categories, also where disclaimers would be provided for content that is inappropriate for certain age groups.
- Providing a definition for age sensitive and the prohibited content.
- Working towards providing its consumers with a proper grievance redressal mechanism to address any concern or complaint that has been raised by the consumer against any content available on these platforms.
The Supreme Court in K. A. Abbas v. UOI held that the treatment of motion pictures must be different from other forms of art & expression due to its versatility, realism, co-ordination of visual and real sense. The court additionally pronounced that the motion picture is capable to stir up emotions more intensely.
Recently, numerous petitions have been filed before various High Courts pleading the courts to pass an order directing government to regulate the content offered by these OTT players in India. In both the petitions, the petitioners had pleaded before the Hon’ble bench to direct the government to make distinct and separate guidelines as well as rules to regulate and control the OTT platform content in India.
Another petition where the petitioner pleaded before the Hon’ble court to rule that the OTT players be regulated under the prevailing Cinematograph Act, 1952. While most of these petitions have either been dismissed or are under-adjudication by the High Courts, one has been taken up before the Supreme Court in appeal.
Conclusion
Oversight battles of films on big screen isn’t another thing to content producers in India, movies like Udta Punjab, Bandit Queen, Lipstick under my Burkha were significant tussles between the makers and Censor Boards. The OTT as a medium is in the Indians as per various industry specialists have given an ascent in the advanced, new, fresh and also an innovative break or a golden opportunity of content makers, one such ascent is the new achievement and accomplishment in the entertainment industry. of a Netflix Original ‘Delhi Crime’ at the global award function, the Emmy Awards, 2020. Whether or not these platforms ought to be directed and regulated or nor can generally be pondered upon, however the State needs to think and take motivation from different nations alongside a couple of nation focused guidelines on these stages, with the end goal that they aren’t being examined for each other substance accessible on their platform and still make the most of their opportunity to communicate and freedom to express.
As far as regulation parameter of OTT platform services is concerned, India should study from nations where regulations have already been put in place. Just like India borrowed numerous principles of Constitution from different nations to give it a comprehensive look, it should also implement the same methodology with respect to regulation of OTT platform and content accessible and available by them.
India should organize distinct and clear guidelines in the form of a code backed by sanctions. The sanctions will guarantee compliance of guidelines set or prescribed by the code. Additionally, the code should set out numerous provisions governing the OTT service industry. Licensing of OTT players should be compulsory. Revenue generated out of business in India by these players should be taxable as per to a reasonable and justified taxation rate. At the same time, OTT players with an Indian Connection giving services in other countries has to be regulated.
Like and Follow us on :
